<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sage Bosses Divided over Future of SaaS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:42:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: £102m &#8211; Minted!</title>
		<link>http://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/#comment-4384</link>
		<dc:creator>£102m &#8211; Minted!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kashflow.com/?p=685#comment-4384</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;got&#8221; the SaaS concept long before Sage did (I&#8217;m still not sure they have) and have been successfully offering a web-based version of Quickbooks (US only) for some time [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;got&#8221; the SaaS concept long before Sage did (I&#8217;m still not sure they have) and have been successfully offering a web-based version of Quickbooks (US only) for some time [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future of Boxed Software</title>
		<link>http://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/#comment-4383</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Boxed Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kashflow.com/?p=685#comment-4383</guid>
		<description>[...] also perhaps an analogy for the future of traditional software companies that don&#8217;t embrace SaaS. Turning to dust and blowing away in the [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also perhaps an analogy for the future of traditional software companies that don&#8217;t embrace SaaS. Turning to dust and blowing away in the [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Irony of Sage - You Are What You Eat</title>
		<link>http://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/#comment-4382</link>
		<dc:creator>The Irony of Sage - You Are What You Eat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kashflow.com/?p=685#comment-4382</guid>
		<description>[...] blogged today that Sage may never get SaaS. Ultimately he offered the same proposed solution as I did back in May: that they should spin off a new company - seperate from the current management - specifically to [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogged today that Sage may never get SaaS. Ultimately he offered the same proposed solution as I did back in May: that they should spin off a new company &#8211; seperate from the current management &#8211; specifically to [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Stockdill</title>
		<link>http://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/#comment-4380</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stockdill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kashflow.com/?p=685#comment-4380</guid>
		<description>Spot on Duane.  Good luck to Sage buying 37s though...  I imagine the philosophies of those two companies might be incompatible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on Duane.  Good luck to Sage buying 37s though&#8230;  I imagine the philosophies of those two companies might be incompatible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/#comment-4379</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 06:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kashflow.com/?p=685#comment-4379</guid>
		<description>@Wilf Uh oh. Careful. Duane will release the flying monkeys to hunt you down.. it&#039;s Kash_F_low! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wilf Uh oh. Careful. Duane will release the flying monkeys to hunt you down.. it&#8217;s Kash_F_low! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilf</title>
		<link>http://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/#comment-4378</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kashflow.com/?p=685#comment-4378</guid>
		<description>or buy Kashflow and rebrand to Sageflow :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or buy Kashflow and rebrand to Sageflow :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/#comment-4377</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kashflow.com/?p=685#comment-4377</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised to hear that there appear to be conflicting opinions within Sage on SaaS - it&#039;s something that we&#039;ve debated heavily (albeit not in the accountancy sphere) - and we&#039;re smaller than they are!

However, to me, it seems clear that SaaS is a popular business model, rapidly growing - and one which empowers ISVs to deliver significant benefits to their users. If we gain the further benefit that &#039;big&#039; companies don&#039;t want to join in.. well.. it&#039;s their loss! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised to hear that there appear to be conflicting opinions within Sage on SaaS &#8211; it&#8217;s something that we&#8217;ve debated heavily (albeit not in the accountancy sphere) &#8211; and we&#8217;re smaller than they are!</p>
<p>However, to me, it seems clear that SaaS is a popular business model, rapidly growing &#8211; and one which empowers ISVs to deliver significant benefits to their users. If we gain the further benefit that &#8216;big&#8217; companies don&#8217;t want to join in.. well.. it&#8217;s their loss! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/#comment-4376</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kashflow.com/?p=685#comment-4376</guid>
		<description>Whilst I agree on some points, I think that the Sage products have massive amounts to offer in terms of use that SaaS packages don&#039;t have. I don&#039;t quite understand why that can&#039;t be transferred.

Anyway, Sage grow by acquisition, if they want to get into a market, they will buy a product that is their already (or nearly there) - get it to where they want it, and then re-brand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst I agree on some points, I think that the Sage products have massive amounts to offer in terms of use that SaaS packages don&#8217;t have. I don&#8217;t quite understand why that can&#8217;t be transferred.</p>
<p>Anyway, Sage grow by acquisition, if they want to get into a market, they will buy a product that is their already (or nearly there) &#8211; get it to where they want it, and then re-brand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

